Comments on: JCR for UCM…When did that happen? http://contentoncontentmanagement.com/2008/07/jcr-for-ucmwhen-did-that-happen/ Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:45:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Michael Marth http://contentoncontentmanagement.com/2008/07/jcr-for-ucmwhen-did-that-happen/#comment-676 Michael Marth Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:22:37 +0000 http://contentoncontentmanagement.com/?p=98#comment-676 Hi David, I work for Day - thanks for mentioning us. Regarding the "JCR-is-all-Java" topic you bring up you might want to have a look at Apache Sling[1] which is a JCR-based web framework. I wrote a post about how Sling makes JCR content available from languages other than Java[2]. Cheers Michael [1] http://incubator.apache.org/sling/site/index.html [2] http://dev.day.com/microsling/content/blogs/main/rubycr.html Hi David,
I work for Day – thanks for mentioning us. Regarding the “JCR-is-all-Java” topic you bring up you might want to have a look at Apache Sling[1] which is a JCR-based web framework. I wrote a post about how Sling makes JCR content available from languages other than Java[2].
Cheers
Michael

[1] http://incubator.apache.org/sling/site/index.html
[2] http://dev.day.com/microsling/content/blogs/main/rubycr.html

]]> By: Boris Kraft http://contentoncontentmanagement.com/2008/07/jcr-for-ucmwhen-did-that-happen/#comment-673 Boris Kraft Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:46:09 +0000 http://contentoncontentmanagement.com/?p=98#comment-673 Nice write up. I like the title ;-) We have been using JCR with Magnolia since its inception, more than 5 years ago. Magnolia allows to plug in different repositories. The benefit here is less that you can replace Magnolia with another system while keeping the data. This would certainly be possible but only as an intermediate step. However, the ability to switch implementations to see what works best for your specific usage pattern is definitely assuring, and something we do regularly when updates are available. To that extend, I do hope to get my fingers on an Oracle Level 2 JCR eventually. Nice write up. I like the title ;-)
We have been using JCR with Magnolia since its inception, more than 5 years ago. Magnolia allows to plug in different repositories. The benefit here is less that you can replace Magnolia with another system while keeping the data. This would certainly be possible but only as an intermediate step. However, the ability to switch implementations to see what works best for your specific usage pattern is definitely assuring, and something we do regularly when updates are available. To that extend, I do hope to get my fingers on an Oracle Level 2 JCR eventually.

]]> By: coreContentOnly - Why I Like The JCR Post Over At contentoncontentmanagement.com http://contentoncontentmanagement.com/2008/07/jcr-for-ucmwhen-did-that-happen/#comment-645 coreContentOnly - Why I Like The JCR Post Over At contentoncontentmanagement.com Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:24:59 +0000 http://contentoncontentmanagement.com/?p=98#comment-645 [...] on David Roe’s Blog "Content on Content Management" he has recently posted a pretty good article on the newly added Content Server JCR Repository Adapter. I really liked his post because he [...] [...] on David Roe’s Blog “Content on Content Management” he has recently posted a pretty good article on the newly added Content Server JCR Repository Adapter. I really liked his post because he [...]

]]> By: Atul http://contentoncontentmanagement.com/2008/07/jcr-for-ucmwhen-did-that-happen/#comment-643 Atul Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:56:25 +0000 http://contentoncontentmanagement.com/?p=98#comment-643 Interesting post. I was wondering if you could add email subscription in your blog ;-) . Thanks anyway for wonderful update on UCM. <a href="http://onlineappsdba.com" rel="nofollow">http://onlineappsdba.com</a> Interesting post. I was wondering if you could add email subscription in your blog ;-) .

Thanks anyway for wonderful update on UCM.

http://onlineappsdba.com

]]> By: Jason Stortz http://contentoncontentmanagement.com/2008/07/jcr-for-ucmwhen-did-that-happen/#comment-642 Jason Stortz Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:37:09 +0000 http://contentoncontentmanagement.com/?p=98#comment-642 Thanks for pointing this out! Typically we will stick to using the web services (SOAP) integration almost universally as we have the same patterns to deal with whether we choose a client that is based on java, .net or etc. Each technology has a place however and I have always enjoyed the variety of ways the content server product has supplied for integration. This is yet another avenue, and that’s great. I suppose one of the things I liked the most about this post was the dose reality that you sprinkled on as you discussed the approach of swapping backend vendors and mentioned some of the political games involved in the evolution of JSR’s and JCR’s. I really appreciate it when someone tries to lay out both sides of the story and a little history to boot. Thanks so much. Thanks for pointing this out! Typically we will stick to using the web services (SOAP) integration almost universally as we have the same patterns to deal with whether we choose a client that is based on java, .net or etc. Each technology has a place however and I have always enjoyed the variety of ways the content server product has supplied for integration. This is yet another avenue, and that’s great. I suppose one of the things I liked the most about this post was the dose reality that you sprinkled on as you discussed the approach of swapping backend vendors and mentioned some of the political games involved in the evolution of JSR’s and JCR’s. I really appreciate it when someone tries to lay out both sides of the story and a little history to boot. Thanks so much.

]]>