<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News Items &#8211; Bloggers and Component Updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://contentoncontentmanagement.com/2008/04/news-items-bloggers-and-component-updates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://contentoncontentmanagement.com/2008/04/news-items-bloggers-and-component-updates/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:45:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DotNetNuke Expert</title>
		<link>http://contentoncontentmanagement.com/2008/04/news-items-bloggers-and-component-updates/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>DotNetNuke Expert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ContentOnContentManagement.com/?p=70#comment-534</guid>
		<description>Ahh yes, critical word excluded from my post! If i knew nothing of DotNetNuke and set it up today, I would quickly move on.  It takes some work to know all the things that need to be changed to make it perform better and not just look awful.  We turn off much of the logging, that will kill performance pretty quick.

I&#039;ve read about Ektron before, ill check out SiteCore.  Thanks for the links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh yes, critical word excluded from my post! If i knew nothing of DotNetNuke and set it up today, I would quickly move on.  It takes some work to know all the things that need to be changed to make it perform better and not just look awful.  We turn off much of the logging, that will kill performance pretty quick.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read about Ektron before, ill check out SiteCore.  Thanks for the links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Roe</title>
		<link>http://contentoncontentmanagement.com/2008/04/news-items-bloggers-and-component-updates/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>David Roe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ContentOnContentManagement.com/?p=70#comment-533</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been well over a year since I last played with DotNetNuke, so perhaps things have changed, but my main problem with it is it&#039;s performance.  I&#039;ll grant you that it has a lot of nice functions and it&#039;s pretty easy to use, but I think there&#039;s too much overhead in it to process a page quickly.

I definitely disagree that its &quot;the best .NET CMS&quot; too.  Perhaps the best OpenSource .NET CMS?...And I&#039;ll only not argue with that statement for lack of experience working with the others.  We use Ektron and SiteCore at work and I&#039;d say the best .NET CMS title would fall to one of them.

Thanks very much for the comment though, I really do appreciate them.  I checked out your site, and that is some pretty cool work you&#039;ve done.  You&#039;ve definitely taken DNN pretty far!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been well over a year since I last played with DotNetNuke, so perhaps things have changed, but my main problem with it is it&#8217;s performance.  I&#8217;ll grant you that it has a lot of nice functions and it&#8217;s pretty easy to use, but I think there&#8217;s too much overhead in it to process a page quickly.</p>
<p>I definitely disagree that its &#8220;the best .NET CMS&#8221; too.  Perhaps the best OpenSource .NET CMS?&#8230;And I&#8217;ll only not argue with that statement for lack of experience working with the others.  We use Ektron and SiteCore at work and I&#8217;d say the best .NET CMS title would fall to one of them.</p>
<p>Thanks very much for the comment though, I really do appreciate them.  I checked out your site, and that is some pretty cool work you&#8217;ve done.  You&#8217;ve definitely taken DNN pretty far!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DotNetNuke Expert</title>
		<link>http://contentoncontentmanagement.com/2008/04/news-items-bloggers-and-component-updates/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>DotNetNuke Expert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ContentOnContentManagement.com/?p=70#comment-532</guid>
		<description>DotNetNuke isn&#039;t that bad ;) just don&#039;t use any of the core modules and when you develop with it don&#039;t use any of their middle tier.  Then it&#039;s actually pretty good haha. We use entity spaces to do our &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webascender.com/Services/DNN-Custom-Module-Programmers.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;DNN development&lt;/a&gt; and it&#039;s the best .NET CMS we have at the moment so thats what we have to live with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DotNetNuke isn&#8217;t that bad <img src='http://contentoncontentmanagement.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  just don&#8217;t use any of the core modules and when you develop with it don&#8217;t use any of their middle tier.  Then it&#8217;s actually pretty good haha. We use entity spaces to do our <a href="http://www.webascender.com/Services/DNN-Custom-Module-Programmers.aspx" rel="nofollow">DNN development</a> and it&#8217;s the best .NET CMS we have at the moment so thats what we have to live with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

